Chargement…
Compare
Their words, not ours. What competitors say is quoted, sourced and dated. Compare for yourself.
“35 years of expertise,” a Big Five model combined with needs theory, IRT, the TwoB-R test (cognitive + behavioral), data “anonymized and hosted in France” feeding “the market's most predictive assessments.”
The difference in one sentence
PerformanSe is a long-established psychometrician with a proprietary model; Noike makes the opposite choice - public instruments any psychologist can examine.
| PerformanSe | Noike | |
|---|---|---|
| Seniority | 35 years | Instruments from decades of public research (Goldberg, O*NET tradition) |
| Theoretical basis | Big Five + needs theory, IRT | Big Five (IPIP-NEO-120), motivations (O*NET WIP), reasoning (open-science tasks) |
| Model | Proprietary | Open science, auditable |
| Promise | “The most predictive on the market” | No promise of prediction, stated |
| Advisory support | Yes, long-standing | Autonomy: readable without psychometric expertise |
| Price | Price on request | from €59/mo, shown |
Choose PerformanSe if…
you're looking for long-term advisory support with a long-established French publisher.
Choose Noike if…
you prefer instruments no one asks you to take on trust.
All statements about competitors come from their own public websites and materials (July 2026).