Chargement…
Compare
Their words, not ours. What competitors say is quoted, sourced and dated. Compare for yourself.
“the intelligence running your hiring, end to end,” AI agents that “screen, interview, schedule,” screening across “300+ skills,” voice screening “24/7 in 45+ languages,” enterprise references (H&M, PwC, Deloitte, IKEA). Maki notes that the final decision stays human.
The difference in one sentence
Maki automates the hiring process end to end; Noike automates nothing - it prepares your interview.
| Maki | Noike | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | The whole process (“end to end”) | One moment: knowing the person before the interview |
| Autonomous AI agents | Yes, six agents | No |
| Target volume | Large accounts, high volume | SMBs, agencies, independent recruiters |
| Public instruments | Not disclosed | Yes, named |
| Results shared with candidate | Not disclosed | Always |
| Price | Price on request | from €59/mo, shown |
Choose Maki if…
you handle thousands of applications and want to orchestrate the entire hiring funnel above your ATS.
Choose Noike if…
your problem isn't volume but discernment: knowing who the person in front of you really is.
All statements about competitors come from their own public websites and materials (July 2026).